“A STAR practically always asks for a designer, if she has any sense,” Katharine Hepburn said in an unpublished interview from the mid 1970s. No one would dispute that Hepburn had heaps of sense, or be surprised that she had a lot to say about her legendary style. That is the subject of an exhibition at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts at Lincoln Center until Jan. 12.
Organized by the Kent State University Museum, which acquired her performance clothes (as well as personal items like khakis, shoes and makeup) after her death in 2003, “Katharine Hepburn: Dressed for Stage and Screen” includes more than 40 costumes and other pieces she wore in plays and movies like “The Philadelphia Story,” “Adam’s Rib” and “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner.” Also on display are letters, scripts and research notes that Hepburn made, and which are part of the library’s collection of her stage papers.
The actress was a great pack rat; she seemingly saved everything, according to Barbara Cohen-Stratyner, the curator of exhibitions at the library. In addition to somewhat peculiar items like a Russian military uniform from “The Iron Petticoat,” a 1956 comedy she made with Bob Hope, she also kept opening-night telegrams and floral cards. “Rebel Chic,” a companion book published by Skira Rizzoli, has essays by Ms. Cohen-Stratyner and Jean Druesedow, the director of the Kent State museum, as well as by Kohle Yohannan, who helped organize a terrific show years ago on Valentina, the Russian émigré designer who was a favorite of Hepburn’s. It was Valentina who designed the pink organza and crepe wedding gown that she wore in 1939 on Broadway in “The Philadelphia Story” and reused in 1973 as Amanda in “The Glass Menagerie.”
“Her waist went from 20 inches to 26 over her 96 years,” Ms. Druesedow said in an interview. When Ms. Druesedow visited a Connecticut warehouse, around 2008, where Hepburn’s clothing was stored, she was a little stunned by the depth: costumes by Muriel King, Howard Greer and Walter Plunkett, who was responsible for the gorgeous black draped evening dress in “Adam’s Rib.”
“And, of course, there were a lot of beige slacks,” said Ms. Druesedow, noting that Hepburn’s pants, like most of her shoes, were custom-made — in the case of the pants by costume houses like Brooks-Van Horn. For “Alice Adams,” she bought some of the costumes herself, like the Hattie Carnegie straw hat she wore in a scene with Fred MacMurray. She learned early to shape her characters through fashion.
Apart from her performances, Hepburn had a style far ahead of its time. Maybe we take that for granted. I loved a picture of Hepburn in “Rebel Chic.” Taken in 1932, around the time she made “A Bill of Divorcement,” she’s on the RKO lot wearing a pair of faded jeans and a mink coat, with a scarf knotted at her neck. That image could have been taken today, with the difference that Hepburn wasn’t trying to be someone cool or chic. She just was.
Cedric Buchet
Jennifer Lopez, Vogue, 2004. More Photos »FASHION photographers are finally being taken seriously in the art world. Perhaps that is not surprising, given the art world’s recent obsession with fashion as subject matter, but lately those model-chasing photographers are getting their own attention from museums.
A one-stop destination for Times fashion coverage and the latest from the runways.
Follow @NYTimesfashion for fashion, beauty and lifestyle news and headlines.Jean-Paul Goude was the subject of an exhibition in Paris this year; a show of Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin portraits opened at the Dallas Contemporary last month. And on Sunday, the Museum of Fine Arts Boston plans to open a Mario Testino exhibition called “In Your Face.” “We are in a moment of blending in fashion and art and the world in general,” said Mr. Testino, who has photographed countless designer campaigns, magazine features and royal weddings in his three-decade career. His photographs have actually figured into a number of contemporary works, including those by Nate Lowman (an image from a Julia Roberts fragrance campaign) and Karen Kilimnik (a portrait of Kate Moss from Russian Vogue). “It is all probably becoming more and more one,” Mr. Testino said. Here, a look at the stories behind some of his memorable images, which are also included in a book published by Taschen for the exhibition.
Filippo Monteforte/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesSleeves to the elbow from Prada. More Photos »From the look of the spring shows last month, fashion has had a wake-up call. Designers who routinely cater to stringy adolescents, or parade arm-baring sheaths that only Michelle Obama could love, suddenly seemed to get that their most devoted clients — women well over 40 with upscale tastes and incomes to match — view the first lady’s biceps with serious pangs of envy. This year a handful of tastemakers, among them Dries van Noten, Joseph Altuzarra, Karl Lagerfeld and even the perennially youth-conscious Marc Jacobs finally acknowledged those customers, offering them camouflage in the shape of . . . sleeves. Long scarce on the runways, caped sleeves, belled and puffed variations, bracelet sleeves and those extending to the wrists have returned in force. Their resurgence may well owe a debt to the Duchess of Cambridge, who flits around London, her arms discreetly covered. Or to hit shows like “Homeland,” whose heroine would be apt to think twice before baring her shoulders in a crowded Beirut market. Or, for that matter, to a belated recognition that much of high fashion’s fan base is in the Middle East. Whatever the impetus, frocks and blouses with sleeves are likely to give more-revealing styles a run for the money in the spring, not just on the runways but also in mainstream stores. Retailers like Nordstrom, Gap and Bloomingdale’s are already showcasing dresses with sleeves on their Web sites. And by next season, presumably, a wardrobe feature that once telegraphed matron or (shudder) mother of the bride, will have acquired a bracing dose of cool. 